References

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Better returns from controlling liver fluke. 2012. https://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/LeafletReducing-liver-fluke.pdf (accessed 25 June 2024)

Aitken MM, Hughes DL, Jones PW, Hall GA, Smith GS Immunological responses of fluke-infected and fluke-free cattle to Salmonella dublin and other antigens. Res Vet Sci. 1979; 27:(3)306-312

Beesley NJ, Williams DJ, Paterson S, Hodgkinson J Fasciola hepatica demonstrates high levels of genetic diversity, a lack of population structure and high gene flow: possible implications for drug resistance. Int J Parasitol. 2017; 47:(1)11-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.09.007

Behm C, Sangster N Pathology, pathophysiology and clinical aspects. In: Dalton J (ed). London: CAB International; 1999

Colston M, Mearns R Liver fluke in cattle and sheep: getting ahead of a rapidly adapting parasite. In Practice. 2023; 45:332-343 https://doi.org/10.1002/inpr.341

COWS. Guide to managing liver fluke in bought in cattle. 2018. https://www.cattleparasites.org.uk/app/uploads/2018/08/COWS-guide-to-managing-liver-fluke-in-brought-in-cattle1.pdf (accessed 25 June 2024)

COWS. Technical manual. Liver and rumen fluke. 2023. https://www.cattleparasites.org.uk/app/uploads/2023/09/liver-fluke-310823.pdf (accessed 25 June 2024)

COWS, SCOPS. Liver fluke: a guide to test-based control. 2022. https://www.scops.org.uk/workspace/pdfs/fluke-diagnostics-treatment-poster_1_1.pdf (accessed 27 June 2024)

Daniel R, van Dijk J, Jenkins T, Akca A, Mearns R, Williams DJ Composite faecal egg count reduction test to detect resistance to triclabendazole in Fasciola hepatica. Vet Rec. 2012; 171:(6)153-155 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100588

Flanagan A, Edgar HW, Gordon A, Hanna RE, Brennan GP, Fairweather I Comparison of two assays, a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and a coproantigen reduction test (CRT), for the diagnosis of resistance to triclabendazole in Fasciola hepatica in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 176:(2–3)170-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.057

Gordon DK, Zadoks RN, Stevenson H, Sargison ND, Skuce PJ On farm evaluation of the coproantigen ELISA and coproantigen reduction test in Scottish sheep naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 187:(3–4)436-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.02.009

Graham-Brown J, Williams DJL, Skuce P Composite Fasciola hepatica faecal egg sedimentation test for cattle. Vet Rec. 2019; 184:(19) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105128

Hodgkinson JE, Cwiklinski K, Beesley N, Hartley C, Allen K, Williams DJL Clonal amplification of Fasciola hepatica in Galba truncatula: within and between isolate variation of triclabendazole-susceptible and -resistant clones. Parasit Vectors. 2018; 11:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2952-z

Hodgkinson JE, Kaplan RM, Kenyon F Refugia and anthelmintic resistance: concepts and challenges. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2019; 10:51-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.05.001

Howell AK, Malalana F, Beesley NJ Fasciola hepatica in UK horses. Equine Vet J. 2020; 52:(2)194-199 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13149

Howell A, Caminade C, Brülisauer F, Mitchell S, Williams D Is the Ollerenshaw fasciolosis forecasting model fit for the 21st century?. Vet Rec. 2023; 193:(1) https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.2781

John BC, Davies DR, Williams DJL, Hodgkinson JE A review of our current understanding of parasite survival in silage and stored forages, with a focus on Fasciola hepatica metacercariae. Grass Forage Sci. 2019; 74:(2)211-217 https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12429

Kamaludeen J, Graham-Brown J, Stephens N Lack of efficacy of triclabendazole against Fasciola hepatica is present on sheep farms in three regions of England, and Wales. Vet Rec. 2019; 184:(16) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105209

Moreau E, Chauvin A Immunity against helminths: interactions with the host and the intercurrent infections. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010; 2010 https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/428593

Mezo M, González-Warleta M, Carro C, Ubeira FM An ultrasensitive capture ELISA for detection of Fasciola hepatica coproantigens in sheep and cattle using a new monoclonal antibody (MM3). J Parasitol. 2004; 90:(4)845-852 https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-192R

Relf V, Good B, McCarthy E, de Waal T Evidence of Fasciola hepatica infection in Radix peregra and a mollusc of the family Succineidae in Ireland. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 163:(1-2)152-155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.003

Shrestha S, Barratt A, Fox NJ, Vosough Ahmadi B, Hutchings MR Financial impacts of liver fluke on livestock farms under climate change-a farm level assessment. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.564795

Swan GE The pharmacology of halogenated salicylanilides and their anthelmintic use in animals. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1999; 70:(2)61-70 https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v70i2.756

Update on liver fluke in sheep and cattle

02 July 2024
10 mins read
Volume 29 · Issue 4
Figure 2. Mature flukes isolated from the liver of a sheep. Photo credit John Graham-Brown.
Figure 2. Mature flukes isolated from the liver of a sheep. Photo credit John Graham-Brown.

Abstract

Fasciola hepatica, the common liver fluke, affects the health and welfare of grazing animals worldwide. Liver fluke infection has a significant economic cost to the UK agriculture industry through sheep deaths, reduced growth rates, fertility and milk production in sheep and cattle and condemned livers at the abattoir. Changing weather patterns in the UK over recent years have often resulted in milder winters and summers that may be hot or wet but are above all unpredictable, affecting the epidemiology of liver fluke. This poses a risk for farmers relying on traditional calendar-based treatment routines, who may be caught out by liver fluke risk periods that are longer and extend beyond what would traditionally have been expected. Triclabendazole resistance is an increasing problem in many parts of the country and with no new flukicides on the horizon, existing products need to be used responsibly to ensure they remain useful for as long as possible.

It is difficult to define the true cost of liver fluke infection to UK farming, but the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) estimated a cost of £6 per infected lamb and £96 per infected beef calf (AHDB, 2012). At the herd level, Fasciola hepatica infection results in an estimated 12% and 6% reduction in net profit on an average dairy and beef unit, respectively (Shrestha et al, 2020). Changing weather patterns in the UK over recent years have often resulted in milder winters and summers that may be hot or wet but are above all unpredictable, affecting the epidemiology of liver fluke (Howell et al, 2023).

Lifecycle and epidemiology

The liver fluke life cycle takes around 20 weeks to complete and requires a snail intermediate host (Figure 1). Mature flukes (Figure 2) reside in the liver of the definitive host. Fluke eggs are passed out in the faeces of infected livestock and develop on pasture. This development is temperature-dependent and takes 2–4 weeks. Eggs then hatch to release miracidia that seek out a host snail. After burrowing into the snail via its foot, the parasites undergo clonal division in the snail body cavity over several weeks, producing several thousand genetically identical cercariae that are then released from the snail (Hodgkinson et al, 2018). The cercariae encyst on plant matter as metacercariae, which are the infective stage. When eaten by a grazing animal, the metacercariae excyst and the young flukes migrate through the gut wall into the liver. It then takes a further 10 weeks for fluke to mature and produce eggs that can be detected in faeces.

Figure 1. The liver fluke life cycle.
Figure 2. Mature flukes isolated from the liver of a sheep. Photo credit John Graham-Brown.

In the UK, the main intermediate host of liver fluke is Galba truncatula, a mud snail measuring 2–5 mm in length (Figure 3). Others snail species, such as Radix and Succinea, may be involved in transmission in acidic moorland soils (Relf et al, 2009). Common habitats include poorly drained areas as well as the banks of ditches, ponds and streams (Figure 4). Poaching because of animal movements can create exposed mud around these features which allows algae, G. truncatula's main food source, to grow.

Figure 3. Galba truncatula in its typical habitat
Figure 4. Typical mud snail habitats: exposed mud because of horse footprints on a poorly drained area by a track (left) and a drainage ditch in rough pasture (right).

Fasciolosis is a seasonal disease in the UK, with mean daily temperatures above 10°C required for the development of the free-living and intramolluscan stages. This has traditionally been the case between May and October, although climate change is extending the window of parasite transmission. If weather conditions are wet over the summer months, large numbers of metacercariae are then released from snails onto the pasture between August and October; conversely, extreme hot and dry conditions in spring or summer, as seen in some recent years, can lead to a snail population crash and a subsequent low risk of liver fluke – unless a further period of mild wet weather allows snails to recover before cooler weather sets in again.

F. hepatica can infect a range of animals as well as sheep and cattle. In the UK, rabbits, hares, deer and horses have been found to be infected. Genetic studies have shown that F. hepatica isolated from sheep, cattle and horses come from the same population (Beesley et al, 2017; Howell et al, 2020). This has implications both for parasite control and for the spread of drug-resistant fluke.

Effect on the host

Sheep are more susceptible to the effects of liver fluke infection than cattle. Acute fasciolosis, often seen in the autumn, is the result of blood loss and liver damage caused by high numbers of young migrating fluke following consumption of heavily contaminated herbage. If smaller numbers of infective metacercariae are ingested over a longer period, chronic fasciolosis is the likely outcome and is usually seen in winter or spring. Typical clinical signs are weight loss and anaemia. Cattle are more resilient as, in addition to possessing a larger liver and hence a greater reserve of functional liver tissue, the strong fibrotic reaction elicited by the migrating juvenile flukes prevents the long-term survival of a large proportion of their number. Hence, while acute deaths can occur following a particularly severe challenge, the more common clinical picture is of chronic fasciolosis or subclinical disease (Behm and Sangster, 1999). Weight gain, fertility and milk production can be impaired, even with low fluke burdens. Individual flukes can live for months to years in the host if left untreated, and sheep and cattle do not develop protective immunity against liver fluke. Chronic infection can have an immunosuppressive effect on the host and increase susceptibility to other conditions, such as Salmonella dublin (Aitkin et al, 1979; Moreau and Chauvin, 2010).

Diagnosis

As a result of the increasingly unpredictable nature of fasciolosis outbreaks, as well as resistance to flukicidal drugs, livestock producers are being encouraged to test before treating (COWS, 2023). Treating at traditional risk periods could result in treatments being given too early, wasting money and leaving animals vulnerable later on. There are several tests available; the best test will depend on the time of year and the type and age of animals at risk.

Detection of fluke eggs in faeces by faecal egg counts (FEC; Figure 5) demonstrates the presence of live adult fluke within the host and so are most useful in winter, spring and early summer. They can be used on individual faecal samples or composite samples (Daniel et al, 2012; Graham-Brown et al, 2019). FEC are useful to confirm that treatment has been effective, if a second sample is tested 3 weeks after treatment. However, they cannot detect early infections (before about 10 weeks) and hence cannot be used for the diagnosis of acute fasciolosis. They can also have low sensitivity if used on single animals or on small volumes of faeces, particularly in cattle. Testing ten individuals and taking at least 10 g of faeces per animal helps ensure adequate sensitivity (Graham-Brown et al, 2019).

Figure 5. A liver fluke egg isolated from a faecal sample and seen under the microscope.

The coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELI-SA) detects enzymes secreted by fluke in faeces (Mezo et al, 2004). It can give a positive test around two weeks before FEC, and can also be used to confirm efficacy of treatment (Flanagan et al, 2011; Gordon et al, 2012). Individual faecal samples should be taken and tested separately. Ten individuals from a larger group can be tested to inform treatment of the group (COWS and SCOPS, 2022; Colston and Mearns, 2023). The coproantigen ELISA is most useful from winter until the following summer.

Serum antibody detection ELISAs are most useful for monitoring exposure in lambs in their first grazing season and should be used on farms that routinely give autumn fluke treatment. Samples should be collected from ten lambs per management group each month from late summer until seroconversion (COWS and SCOPS, 2022; Colston and Mearns, 2023). Lambs seroconvert 2–4 weeks following infection, meaning a positive antibody test in first season grazing lambs is useful to target treatment at the right time. The same principle applies to calves if they are at risk of acute fasciolosis. Serum antibodies persist following treatment, so testing serum cannot be used to assess treatment efficacy, and false positives may sometimes result when testing older animals with prior exposure. The sensitivity and specificity of antibody-detection ELISAs is high, at over 80%.

Bulk milk tank testing detects antibodies and can be done a few times a year to monitor infection levels within a herd. Individual milk antibody testing is a useful way to identify whether a dairy cow is infected, for example if considering treatment at drying off. The limitations are similar to serum antibody testing.

Post-mortem examination of suspect fallen stock as well as abattoir reports of liver fluke found in the livers of slaughtered animals can also provide a useful, free source of information.

Treatment and control

Triclabendazole, resistance and other flukicidal drugs

Triclabendazole is unique in its efficacy against immature fluke that are from 2 days old in sheep and 2 weeks old in cattle. Historically, a lack of diagnostic tests available for early fluke infection meant that sheep on high-risk farms were repeatedly dosed with triclabendazole in the autumn to avoid the risk of acute fasciolosis, which has unfortunately led to resistance. A recent prevalence study showed that triclabendazole resistance was present in north-west, north-east and south-west England and in Wales (Kamaludeen et al, 2019).

Triclabendazole requires partial metabolism by the liver in order to work, so it may be ineffective in severely parasitised individuals, or those with concurrent liver disease from another cause. Apparent flukicide failure can also occur as a result of underestimation of bodyweight or uncalibrated equipment. If in doubt, doing a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) to confirm the level of resistance to triclabendazole is advisable (Box 1; Daniel et al, 2012).

How to perform a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) for liver fluke resistance to triclabendazole

Eggs must be present in faeces in order to do the test.

Day 1:

  • Collect at least 5 g (approx. 1 heaped teaspoonful) of faeces from 10 individual sheep into separate containers/plastic bags/gloves
  • Mark the 10 sheep so that they can be identified later
  • Treat with the correct flukicide dose for the weight of sheep.
  • Day 21:

    Repeat the faecal sampling in the same way, from the same individual sheep as before.

    A drop in egg numbers of 90–95% or more indicates good levels of efficacy, while any less suggests that resistance is starting to develop.

    The copro-antigen reduction test works on similar principles: see https://www.scops.org.uk/internal-parasites/liver-fluke/tackling-resistance/ for further details.

    Livestock producers are now advised to minimise their reliance on drugs and, when a flukicide is required, to choose one that is appropriate for the age of parasite likely to be present at the time, avoiding over-use of any single active ingredient. In practice, this means triclabendazole is the drug of choice in the autumn for animals at risk from acute fasciolosis, with closantel another option at this time of year. For housed cattle or for treating sheep in the spring, one of the other products active against adult stage parasites is preferable. Table 1 shows the licensed flukicide products available in the UK. The plethora of different brands and formulations of these few active ingredients can sometimes cause confusion over which active is being used.


    Active ingredient Minimum age of fluke killed (sheep) Minimum age of fluke killed (cattle) Optimum time of year to use Use in dairy cattle (guide only – check product data sheets)
    Albendazole 12 weeks 12 weeks Spring 60 hours milk withhold
    Oxyclozanide 12 weeks 12 weeks Spring 108 hours milk withhold
    Clorsulon N/A 12 weeks Spring Use at beginning of dry period only
    Rafoxanide 12 weeks 12 weeks Spring Not licensed
    Closantel 5 weeks 7 weeks Autumn Not licensed
    Triclabendazole 2 days 2 weeks/6–8 weeks (depending on formulation) Autumn Oral only. Use at beginning of dry period only
    Adapted from SCOPS (https://www.scops.org.uk/workspace/pdfs/product-options-table-liver-fluke-updated.pdf) and COWS (https://www.cattleparasites.org.uk/app/uploads/2023/09/liver-fluke-310823.pdf). For further details including brand names and withdrawal periods see https://www.scops.org.uk/workspace/pdfs/know-your-anthelmintics-2024.pdf

    Currently there is no resistance reported to the other flukicides in the UK, but this is always a risk, particularly for closantel as the second-best option for treating immature stages. In addition, frequent use of closantel may increase the risk of resistant Haemonchus species (barber's pole worms) emerging, if these are present on farm. There are no new drugs or vaccines entering the market in the near future, making it vital to use the available drugs responsibly. The concept of preserving a population of parasites in refugia (leaving some of the flock untreated) is advised for control of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep but is considered too risky for liver fluke because of its high pathogenicity (Hodgkinson et al, 2019).

    Figure 6. Quarantine: incoming livestock should be kept on (A) hardstanding (ideal) or (B) low-risk pasture until treated and tested.

    Rafoxanide is a relatively new re-addition to the market in the UK, although it has been used elsewhere in the intervening period. There is evidence of cross-resistance between closantel and rafoxanide (Swan, 1999), therefore rafoxanide should not be used as an alternative to closantel.

    Control programmes

    Control programmes should be farm-specific and take into account whether triclabendazole resistance is present. Controlling fluke is complicated, so veterinary involvement is essential. Because of the seasonal nature of fasciolosis it is helpful to divide the year into seasons for planning purposes.

    In spring, the focus should be on the prevention of pasture contamination. Sheep and cattle should be tested to see if they are infected, if they were not treated during the winter. A composite FEC is a convenient way of doing this. If treatment is necessary, something that is effective only against adult parasites should be used. Spring is also a good time to perform a FECRT to ascertain triclabendazole resistance if egg counts are high enough.

    Autumn is the high-risk period for acute fasciolosis; as far as possible, avoid grazing wet pasture at this time of year. If sheep are on the farm, or if cattle are at high risk, use the serum antibody test monthly from late summer to determine when and whether to treat. None of the flukicides have any persistent activity, so stock will become re-infected if kept on contaminated pasture, potentially needing repeat treatment.

    During the winter months, for housed cattle, testing is advised rather than routine treatment. If FEC are used, it is advisable to wait several weeks after housing and then, if necessary, to use a product active against mature flukes.

    The same seasonal principles apply in dairy herds, although treatment can usually only be given during the dry period. Cows should be tested before treatment; the milk antibody test can be used at any time of year. Choice of product, if needed, should be made considering the time of year and the likely ages of fluke present (Table 1). Care should be taken as some products, including rafoxanide and injectable formulations of triclabendazole, cannot be used in dairy replacements of any age.

    Reducing liver fluke exposure through pasture management should be considered. Identification of snail habitats is difficult as these can change within and between seasons depending on weather and vegetation coverage. Wet areas with exposed mud are likely to harbour snails unless the soil is very acidic, such as peat uplands. Options to consider include avoiding wet pastures during high-risk periods (autumn), temporary fencing of wet areas during risk periods, permanent fencing of wet areas, or housing of animals during high-risk periods. Infective fluke cysts cannot survive in good quality silage (John et al, 2019). Complete avoidance of wet pastures or flukey areas is often not possible because of insufficient alternative pasture or drinking facilities.

    All animals brought onto the farm should be considered to be potential carriers of triclabendazole-resistant fluke, including rams, bulls and overwintering sheep, and should be quarantined accordingly. Current advice from COWS (2018) is to keep incoming sheep or cattle either indoors (preferably) or on a dry pasture until any liver fluke acquired at the previous farm are mature enough to be killed by a flukicide containing an active ingredient other than triclabendazole. For example, closantel can be used for sheep that have been grazing at their farm of origin after a wait period of 5 weeks. Following a further 6 weeks, a FEC or coproantigen test should be used to check treatment has worked before putting out onto fluke risk pasture.

    Conclusions

    Triclabendazole resistance is increasing and the epidemiology of fasciolosis has changed over recent years. Both of these factors present challenges to the control of the parasite. Testing before treatment and, if necessary, choosing the most appropriate product are required for sustainable liver fluke control.

    Further resources

  • Sustainable Control of Parasites in Sheep (SCOPS) and Control Of Worms Sustainably (COWS) are two voluntary, industry-led groups that develop accessible, evidence based sustainable parasite control strategies. See scops.org.uk and cattleparasites.org.uk for technical manuals, diagrams and press releases.
  • AHDB is the levy board for all farming sectors. It produces detailed facts and figures, as well as detailed information booklets for farmers: ahdb.org.uk
  • Moredun Research Institute website has some informative short videos explaining aspects of liver fluke control: moredun.org.uk/research/diseases/liver-fluke
  • Scotland's Rural College (SRUC) puts out regular updates on the liver fluke situation in Scotland: sruc.ac.uk/veterinary-surveillance/
  • National Animal Disease Information Service (NADIS) releases a monthly parasite forecast based on weather conditions in 40 km2 local areas, including a liver fluke forecast during the late summer and autumn: https://www.nadis.org.uk/parasite-forecast.aspx
  • KEY POINTS

  • Liver fluke epidemiology is changing as a result of wetter, unpredictable summers and milder winters.
  • Fluke control plans should be farm-specific and require knowledge of triclabendazole resistance status.
  • Instead of routine or calendar-based treatment, an appropriate test should be used to determine whether treatment is likely to be beneficial.