References
Update to UK calf management and housing strategies

Abstract
This article reviews calf-rearing practices and housing on UK dairy farms, with a focus on optimising calf health, welfare and production. Key findings include the continued underfeeding of milk. In terms of housing, there were benefits to pairing, over individual housing, with group housing using automated milk feeders showing potential but requiring careful management of weaning and social interactions. Environmental assessments across different housing types revealed challenges in maintaining optimal conditions, with hutches exhibiting the most extreme temperatures and sheds having higher levels of airborne contaminants. Providing adequate milk, appropriate housing and social conditions, and careful management, particularly during weaning, are crucial for successful calf rearing.
The principal aim of dairy calf rearing is to efficiently produce healthy replacements that can reach their genetic production potential, there-by ensuring the longevity of dairy businesses. However, this goal must now be achieved while considering consumer perceptions of animal welfare and navigating rising costs, labour shortages and increasing sustainability pressures. Providing advice without accounting for all these factors will result in recommendations that have limited uptake within the industry. This article summarises research on calf management strategies, focusing on housing and its impact on calf health and welfare.
A questionnaire of UK farmers who reared dairy calves commercially was carried out in 2020, and had 216 responses (Mahendran et al, 2022). A key finding wasthe recognition of the low level of regular hands-on veterinary involvement in day-to-day health decision-making for calves. It may be that treatment protocols for calves are covered in herd health plans (HHPs) and farm staff feel appropriately trained to make treatment decisions. However, veterinary practices should ensure standard operating procedures (SOPs) for diagnosing and treating diseased calves are in place and are being used across farm clients. These should be a ‘live’ document that is regularly reviewed and revised depending on changing farm conditions, and not simply included in HHPs as a result of standard requirements. Given the impact of changing seasonal conditions for calves, a minimum of twice-yearly reviews might be advisable, with a rationale for quarterly reviews to changes in the weather and disease patterns to be considered when reviewing calf health SOPs.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.