References

Andersen CM, Bonacker RC, Smith EG, Stoecklein KS, Spinka CM, Thomas JM. Evaluation of the 7 & 7 Synch and 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR treatment regimens for control of the estrous cycle among beef cows prior to fixed-time artificial insemination with conventional or sex-sorted semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2021; 235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106892

Atkins JA, Busch DC, Bader JF Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: Effect of day of the cycle. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86:(1)83-93 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0277

Beef Reproduction ask Force. https://beefrepro.org (accessed 28 October 2022)

Bonacker RC, Gray KR, Breiner CA Comparison of the 7 & 7 Synch protocol and the 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol among recipient beef cows in an embryo transfer program. Theriogenology. 2020; 158:490-496 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.09.033

Bridges GA, Hesler LA, Grum DE, Mussar ML, Gasser CL, Day ML. Influence of the length of proestrus on fertility and endocrine function in female cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010; 117:(3–4)208-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anirepro-sci.2009.05.002

Busch DC, Schafer DJ, Wilson DJ Timing of artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows following administration of the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug-release protocol. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86:(7)1519-1525 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-0925

Byerley DJ, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Short RE. Pregnancy rates of beef heifers bred either on puberal or third estrus. J Anim Sci. 1987; 65:(3)645-650 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.653645x

Caldow G, Lowman B, Riddell I. Veterinary intervention in the reproductive management of beef cow herds. In Pract. 2005; 27:(8)406-411 https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.27.8.406

Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Managing the reproductive performance of beef cows. Therio. 2016; 86:(1)379-387 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.052

El-Zarkouny SZ, Cartmill JA, Hensley BA, Stevenson JS. Pregnancy in dairy cows after synchronized ovulation regimens with or without presynchronization and progesterone. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87:(4)1024-1037 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73248-8

Fortune JE. Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biol Reprod. 1994; 50:(2)225-232 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod50.2.225

Geary TW, Downing ER, Bruemmer JE, Whittier JC. Ovarian and estrous response of suckled beef cows to the select synch estrous synchronization protocol. Prof Anim Sci. 2000; 16:(1)1-5 https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31653-3

Geary TW, Salverson RR, Whittier JC. Synchronization of ovulation using GnRH or hCG with the CO-Synch protocol in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2001; 79:(10)2536-2541 https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79102536x

Grant JK, Abreu FM, Hojer NL, Fields SD, Perry BL, Perry GA. Influence of inducing luteal regression before a modified controlled internal drug-releasing device treatment on control of follicular development. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:(11)3531-3541 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3852

Gutierrez K, Kasimanickam R, Tibary A Effect of reproductive tract scoring on reproductive efficiency in beef heifers bred by timed insemination and natural service versus only natural service. Theriogenology. 2014; 81:(7)918-924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.008

Hill SL, Perry GA, Mercadante VR Altered progesterone concentrations by hormonal manipulations before a fixed-time artificial insemination CO-Synch + CIDR program in suckled beef cows. Theriogenology. 2014; 82:(1)104-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.03.008

Holm DE, Thompson PN, Irons PC. The value of reproductive tract scoring as a predictor of fertility and production outcomes in beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 2009; 87:1934-1940 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1579

Kojima FN, Salfen BE, Bader JF Development of an estrus synchronization protocol for beef cattle with short-term feeding of melengestrol acetate : 7-11 synch. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78:(8)2186-2191 https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7882186x

Lamb GC, Stevenson JS, Kesler DJ, Garverick HA, Brown DR, Salfen BE. Inclusion of an intravaginal progesterone insert plus GnRH and prostaglandin F2α for ovulation control in postpartum suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2001; 79:(9)2253-2259 https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7992253x

Lamb GC, Larson JE, Geary TW Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2α, and progesterone. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84:(11)3000-3009 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-220

Lamb GC, Dahlen CR, Larson JE, Marquezini G, Stevenson JS. Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: A review. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88:E181-E192 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2349

Lamb GC. Criteria for selecting replacements at weaning, before breeding, and after breeding. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2013; 29:(3)567-578 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.07.003

Larson JE, Lamb GC, Stevenson JS Synchronization of estrus in suckled beef cows for detected estrus and artificial insemination and timed artificial insemination using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2alpha, and progesterone. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84:(2)332-342 https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.842332x

Lowman BG. Triple synchronisation of suckler cows. In Pract. 2003; 25:(1)38-43 https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.25.1.38

Monn RE, Poole RK, Mackey JC A two-injection prostaglandin F2α presynchronization treatment decreases pregnancy rates of cycling replacement beef heifers. Translat Anim Sci. 2019; 3:(1)456-463

Perry GA, Smith MF, Lucy MC Relationship between follicle size at insemination and pregnancy success. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102:(14)5268-5273 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501700102

Perry GA, Perry BL, Krantz JH, Rodgers J. Influence of inducing luteal regression before a modified fixed-time artificial insemination protocol in postpartum beef cows on pregnancy success. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90:(2)489-494 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4319

Penny CD, Lowman BG. Mating beef cows without natural service - a triple synchronisation system.

Peters AR. Calving intervals of beef cows treated with either gonadotrophin releasing hormone or a progesterone releasing intravaginal device. Vet Rec. 1982; 110:(22)515-517 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.110.22.515

Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2 alpha and GnRH. Theriogenology. 1995; 44:(7)915-923 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(95)00279-h

Randi F, Kelly AK, Parr MH, Diskin MG, Lively F, Kenny DA. Effect of ovulation synchronization program and season on pregnancy to timed artificial insemination in suckled beef cows. Theriogenology. 2021; 172:223-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.06.021

Roberts AJ, Ketchum JN, Funston RN. Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by number of estrous cycles experienced by start of first breeding. Translat Anim Sci. 2018; 3:(1)541-548 https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy118

Rodgers JC, Bird SL, Larson JE An economic evaluation of estrous synchronization and timed artificial insemination in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90:(11)4055-4062 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4836

Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Custer EE. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 1990; 68:(3)799-816 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683799x

Stevenson JS, Thompson KE, Forbes WL, Lamb GC, Grieger DM, Corah LR. Synchronizing estrus and (or) ovulation in beef cows after combination of GnRH, norgestomet, and prostaglandin F2α with or without timed insemination. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78:(7)1747-1758 https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7871747x

Thompson KE, Stevenson JS, Lamb GC, Grieger DM, Löest CA. Follicular, hormonal, and pregnancy responses of early postpartum suckled beef cows to GnRH, norgestomet, and prostaglandin F2α. 1999; 77:(7)1823-1832 https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7771823x

Twagiramungu H, Guilbault LA, Dufour JJ. Synchronization of ovarian follicular waves with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to increase the precision of estrus in cattle: A review. J Anim Sci. 1995; 73:(10)3141-3151 https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73103141x

Vasconcelos JLM, Sá Filho OG, Perez GC, Silva ATN. Intravaginal progesterone device and/or temporary weaning on reproductive performance of anestrous crossbred Angus × Nelore cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009; 111:(2–4)302-311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.03.012

Webb R, Lamming GE, Haynes NB, Hafs HD, Manns JG. Response of cyclic and post-partum suckled cows to injections of synthetic LH-RH. J Reprod Fertil. 1977; 50:(2)203-210 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0500203

Use of artificial insemination and oestrus synchronisation in beef herds

02 November 2022
13 mins read
Volume 27 · Issue 6
Figure 1. Similar aged beef calves born at the beginning of a seasonal calving block to synchronised dams with fixed time artificial insemination.
Figure 1. Similar aged beef calves born at the beginning of a seasonal calving block to synchronised dams with fixed time artificial insemination.

Abstract

The use of artificial insemmination (AI) in beef herds has been increasing in the last two decades especially when used in conjunction with oestrus synchronisation (OS) protocols. The resultant improvement in reproductive efficiency has a significant impact on productivity and profitability, particularly in seasonal block calving beef herds. Within this it is key that the nulliparous heifers calve down promptly in the block, and if these heifers can have heifer calves it will expediate genetic gain. This article reviews the benefits of using AI and the OS programmes commonly used, including those involving prostaglandin F 2 alpha (PG) alone, progesterone-releasing devices either with PG or with gonadotropin-releasing hormone and PG or with additional equine chorionic gonadotropin. It also comments on the relatively new ‘7 and 7 Synch’ protocol as well as approaches to pre-synchronisation, non-cycling beef cows, late-calving beef cows and pre-pubertal heifers.

Traditionally, beef suckler herds have used entirely natural service, with artificial insemination (AI) used only on small numbers of cows in pedigree herds. However, use of AI has been increasing over the last two decades as producers seek to take advantage of its benefits (Table 1). This is especially true when used in conjunction with oestrus synchronisation (OS) programmes, which have been developed to minimise the time needed for oestrus detection and the number of cattle handlings while maximising conception rates.

This article aims to set out the main options available for the use of AI in beef herds, particularly concentrating on the use of OS protocols and how they have been refined over the last 20 years, with increasing knowledge of follicular dynamics.

The management of beef cows and heifers to ensure optimal reproductive performance is beyond the scope of this article and the authors recommend the papers by Caldow et al (2005) and Diskin and Kenny (2016) for comprehensive reviews of this aspect.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.