References

de Jong E, Creytens L, De Vliegher S Selective treatment of nonsevere clinical mastitis does not adversely affect cure, somatic cell count, milk yield, recurrence, or culling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci. 2023a; 106:(2)1267-1286 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22271

de Jong E, McCubbin KD, Speksnijder D Invited review: selective treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2023b; 106:(6)3761-3778 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22826

European Medicines Agency. Categorisation of antibiotics for use in animals. 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/infographic-categorisation-antibiotics-use-animals-prudent-responsible-use_en.pdf (accessed 14 February 2024)

Lago A, Godden SM, Bey R, Ruegg PL, Leslie K The selective treatment of clinical mastitis based on on-farm culture results: I. Effects on antibiotic use, milk withholding time, and short-term clinical and bacteriological outcomes. J Dairy Sci. 2011a; 94:(9)4441-4456 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4046

Lago A, Godden SM, Bey R, Ruegg PL, Leslie K The selective treatment of clinical mastitis based on on-farm culture results: II. Effects on lactation performance, including clinical mastitis recurrence, somatic cell count, milk production, and cow survival. J Dairy Sci. 2011b; 94:(9)4457-4467 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4047

Lago A, Godden SM Use of rapid culture systems to guide clinical mastitis treatment decisions. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018; 34:(3)389-412 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.06.001

Malcata FB, Pepler PT, O'Reilly EL Point-of-care tests for bovine clinical mastitis: what do we have and what do we need?. J Dairy Res. 2020; 87:(S1)60-66 https://doi.org/10.1017/S002202992000062X

Mansion-de Vries EM, Lücking J, Wente N, Zinke C, Hoedemaker M, Krömker V Comparison of an evidence-based and a conventional mastitis therapy concept with regard to cure rates and antibiotic usage. Milk Science International-Milchwissenschaft. 2016; 69:(6)27-32

Munoz MA, Bennett GJ, Ahlström C, Griffiths HM, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN Cleanliness scores as indicator of Klebsiella exposure in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:(10)3908-3916 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1090

Schukken Y, Chuff M, Moroni P, Gurjar A, Santisteban C, Welcome F, Zadoks R The “other” gram-negative bacteria in mastitis: Klebsiella, serratia, and more. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012; 28:(2)239-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.04.001

Valckenier D, Piepers S, Schukken YH Longitudinal study on the effects of intramammary infection with non-aureus staphylococci on udder health and milk production in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci. 2021; 104:(1)899-914 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18685

Vasquez AK, Nydam DV, Capel MB, Eicker S, Virkler PD Clinical outcome comparison of immediate blanket treatment versus a delayed pathogen-based treatment protocol for clinical mastitis in a New York dairy herd. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(4)2992-3003 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11614

Selective treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows

02 March 2024
14 mins read
Volume 29 · Issue 2

Abstract

Over the last few years, the author, alongside many other dairy vets, has been working with dairy farmers to support them in carrying out selective dry cow therapy in their herds, while ensuring that cow health and welfare are not compromised. We can now have more informed discussions about the selective treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. This has been enabled by the recent advances and availability of cow-side pathogen testing, with several publications in the scientific literature evaluating farms carrying out selective treatment of clinical mastitis compared to blanket treatment, as well as the improved on-farm data we have around mastitis cases and mastitis patterns in our herds. The advantage of selective treatment is predominantly the reduced antibiotic use aligned with the One Health approach to the responsible use of antibiotics. There are other advantages to the selective treatment of cases, including targeted (narrow spectrum) antibiotic use and the increased farm focus and close monitoring of mastitis cases and cure rates on farm that come with reviewing mastitis treatment protocols. Vets can also be actively engaged in discussing the treatment and monitoring outcomes of mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis, an area that has often been overlooked as a result of the focus on sick cows or toxic/severe cases requiring more involved and tailored therapy. Rapid and accurate cow-side pathogen tests allow selective treatment of clinical mastitis to be carried out on farm without compromising on treatment delay, so that the most effective treatment can be given to the appropriate mastitis cases. The focus of mastitis control must always remain on preventative measures to reduce the number of new infections. Through on-farm engagement with a wider mastitis discussion and creating bespoke tailored mastitis treatment programmes as part of selective treatment of clinical mastitis, this can serve as a regular reminder that prevention of new infections will always lead to the most significant benefits. This article reviews the available information on the selective treatment of clinical mastitis and presents some initial steps in data gathering and evaluation to ensure that the appropriate farms are undertaking selective treatment of mastitis cases.

The selective treatment of clinical mastitis is based on the now widely accepted evidence that the self-cure rate of many Gram-negative bacteria is high without the need for antibiotic therapy (Mansion-de Vries et al, 2016; Lago and Godden, 2018). This allows for more targeted treatment of Gram-positive bacteria, while it may be appropriate for Gram-negative bacteria to be treated without antibiotics. The recent advances and increasing availability of cow-side tests to differentiate between a Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria mean that this decision-making process can be based on a test result in conjunction with a wider risk assessment from a mastitis pattern analysis.

The principal benefit of carrying out selective treatment of clinical mastitis is in supporting the One Health approach to the responsible use of antibiotics through the reduction of antibiotic use and targeted antibiotic therapy. Pathogens that do not need antibiotic therapy to increase the likelihood of cure, primarily those with high self-cure rates such as some Gram-negative pathogens, do not receive antibiotic treatment. This will reduce the overall use of antibiotics on a unit, particularly where there is a high proportion of mastitis cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Cases that have Gram-positive bacteria identified can be treated with a targeted narrow spectrum antibiotic as part of the treatment plan. The narrow spectrum antibiotics for mastitis intramammary treatment all fall within the European Medicines Agency classification D (Table 1), for prudent use as first-line therapy wherever possible.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.