References

Abebe R, Hatiya H, Abera M Bovine mastitis: prevalence, risk factors and isolation of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy herds at Hawassa milk shed, South Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0905-3

Aynsley LH, Buol JM The use of a direct test as an indication of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 1965; 77:379-82

Barnum DA, Newbould FHS The Use of the California mastitis test for the detection of bovine mastitis. Can Vet J. 1961; 2:(3)83-90

Brookbanks EO The correlation between California mastitis test results and the presence of mastitis pathogens in composite milk samples. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 1966; 14:(7)89-91 https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1966.33641

Carroll EJ, Schalm OW Effect of deoxyribonuclease on the California Test for Mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 1962; 45:1094-1097

Cole EJ, Painter EV, Schnepper GH Detection efficiency of mastitis screening tests. Journal of food protection. 1965; 28:(1)5-8 https://doi.org/10.4315/0022-2747-28.1.5

Deng Z, Hogeveen H, Lam TJGM, van der Tol R, Koop G Performance of online somatic cell count estimation in automatic milking systems. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00221

Dingwell RT, Leslie KE, Schukken YH Evaluation of the California mastitis test to detect an intramammary infection with a major pathogen in early lactation dairy cows. Can Vet J. 2003a; 44:(5)413-5

Dounce AL, Monty KJ Factors influencing the ability of isolated cell nuclei to from gels in dilute alkali. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955; 1:(2)155-160 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.1.2.155

Duirs GF Methods of mastitis detection including the rolling ball viscometer and electrical conductivity meter. Proceedings of the National Mastitis Council. 1980; 106:25-38

Godden SM, Royster E, Timmerman J Evaluation of an automated milk leukocyte differential test and the California Mastitis Test for detecting intramammary infection in early- and late-lactation quarters and cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(8)6527-44 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12548

Gray DM, Schalm OW Interpretation of the California Mastitis Test results on milk from individual mammary quarters, bucket milk, and bulk herd milk. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1960; 136:195-198

Green T Use of somatic cell counts for detection of subclinical mastitis in ewes. Veterinary Record. 1984; 114:(2)43-43 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.114.2.43

Hogeveen H Test in comparison to electronically-counted somatic cells in bovine milk. 2005;

Leach KA, Green MJ, Breen JE Use of domestic detergents in the California mastitis test for high somatic cell counts in milk. Vet Rec. 2008; 163:(19)566-70 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.163.19.566

Leslie KE, Jansen JT, Lim GH Opportunities and implications for improved on-farm cowside diagnostics. De Leval Hygiene Symposium. 2002;

Luedecke LO, Forster TL, Ashworth US Relationship between California mastitis test reaction and leucocyte count, catalase activity, and a-esterase activity of milk from opposite quarters. Journal of Dairy Science. 1967; 50:(10)1592-6 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87678-1

Marshall RT, Edmondson JE Value of California mastitis test records to the practitioner. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1962; 140:45-49

Miller DD, Kearns JV Effectiveness of the California Mastitis Test as a measuremrnt of the leucocyte content of quarter samples of milk. J Dairy Sci. 1967; 50:(5)683-6 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(67)87492-7

Milne JR, De Langen H Observations on the California mastitis test (CMT) Reaction. I. The roles of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and milk proteins in the reaction. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology. 1977; 12:44-47

Mollenhorst H, van der Tol PP, Hogeveen H Somatic cell count assessment at the quarter or cow milking level. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:(7)3358-3364 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2842

Nageswararao G, Derbyshire JB Studies on the mechanism of gel formation in the California mastitis test reaction. J Dairy Res. 1969; 36:359-369

Nageswararao G, Calbert HE A comparison of screening tests to detect abnormal milk. J Milk Food Tech. 1969; 32:365-368

National Mastitis Council. Guidelines on normal and abnormal raw milk. 2021. https://www.nmconline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Guidelines-on-Normal-and-Abnormal-Raw-Milk.pdf (accessed 5 September 2024)

Neitzel AC, Stamer E, Junge W, Thaller G Calibration of an automated California mastitis test with focus on the device-dependent variation. Springerplus. 2014; 3 https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-760

Philpot WN Role of therapy in mastitis control. J Dairy Sci. 1969; 52:(5)708-713 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86633-6

Postle DS The Wisconsin mastitis test. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc. 1964; 68:488-94

Roberts J The California Mastitis Test – Is there a value?. Cattle Practice. 2023; 31:(1)

Ruegg PL Milk quality and mastitis tests. Bov Pract. 2002; 36:41-54

Ruegg PL, Sekito L Test characteristics and comparison of methods used to detect subclinical mastitis. 2004;

Safi S, Khoshvaghti A, Jafarzadeh SR Acute phase proteins in the diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis. Vet Clin Pathol. 2009; 38:(4)471-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00156.x

Sanford CJ, Keefe GP, Sanchez J Test characteristics from latent-class models of the California Mastitis Test. Prev Vet Med. 2006; 77:(1-2)96-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.06.006

Sargeant JM, Leslie KE, Shirley JE, Pulkrabek BJ, Lim GH Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2001; 84:(9)2018-2024 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74645-0

Schalm OW, Noorlander DO Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1957; 130:(5)199-204

Schepers AJ, Lam TJ, Schukken YH Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. J Dairy Sci. 1997; 80:(8)1833-40 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76118-6

Smith J, Schultze WD An evaluation of the California mastitis test as a method of estimating the number of cells in milk. 1965; 29:84-7

Werven T, Nijhof C, Bussel T, Hogeveen H Use of on-farm testing of somatic cell count for selection of udder quarters for bacteriological culturing. 2005;

Whyte D, Walmsley M, Liew A, Claycomb R, Mein G Chemical and rheological aspects of gel formation in the California Mastitis Test. J Dairy Res. 2005; 72:(1)115-121 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029904000561

CPD article: The California mastitis test: what is the value?

02 September 2024
14 mins read
Volume 29 · Issue 5

Abstract

The California mastitis test is a widely used cow-side test for the detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. It is easy and cheap to perform on farm, with its use therefore widespread around the world. The test is performed by adding a reagent to a milk sample, agitating the sample and then evaluating the reaction by using a recognised scoring system. Each quarter of an udder is tested by drawing milk into a paddle where the test can be performed. The test can also be performed in other ways, such as on a composite sample or through in-line testing in a milking parlour or automated milking system. The threshold of the test is approximately 400 000 cells/ml. This makes the test useful for determining the infected quarter following a high somatic cell count composite test result, diagnosing subclinical mastitis in a quarter at dry off or assisting with the diagnosis of clinical mastitis, eg in a toxic cow. The limitations of the test are that it is not quantitative, there is variability in operator interpretation and the exact threshold of detection is not known for each testing method. Overall, the test may be a valuable addition to cow-side mastitis diagnosis when used in the appropriate circumstances.

The California mastitis test (CMT) is a cow-side milk test to detect the presence of subclinical mastitis. It is commonly used in the milking parlour to detect changes in the milk that are not visible to the naked eye. The test can be easily performed by a farmer or herdsman and gives a rapid result that allows a decision to be made about the milk hygiene before it enters the bulk tank. Standardisation of the test was published in the early 1960s to prevent confusion and misinterpretation of the test and this is still followed to the present day. At present the CMT is the only available cheap cow-side test for diagnosing the presence of infection in individual quarters. It is therefore widely used worldwide.

Milk is drawn from each quarter of the udder into a corresponding well in the paddle (Figure 1). Excess milk is drained away by tilting the paddle until approximately 3 ml of milk is left in each well, a graduated line on the rim of the wells denotes the level to drain to (Figure 2).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.